In Other News November 16, 2019

Among the wicked agendas imposed on this country, climate engineering and related fallout is at the top. These operations are so deceptive and diabolical, many protect themselves from learning more and remain in disbelief while they’re aggressively deployed night and day in plain sight. However, sinister operations at this magnitude couldn’t happen without a network of compliant people behind the scenes from so called environmental groups, pentagon generals, propaganda media, NASA scientists, university professors to TV meteorologists under gag orders.The recent climate emergency crisis legislation is a great example of agenda driven law making faciliated by some who secretly know that climate engineering is causing so called extreme weather. Passing this legislation is said to be used as a symbol, but the truth is most people now know climate engineering is causing extreme weather and that its being used to further a fake green agenda that will erode more civil liberties and help lock in a surveillance state. But that truth won’t be properly broadcast. Little advancement on the topic of geoengineering is offered. Most articles written about geoengineering in the last 8 years patronize the reader with a circular narrative offered by bought scientists from Cornell, Stanford and Harvard. Recently, 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang proposed that geoengineering be deployed to counter the effects of climate change. Mr. Yang is betting you don’t know that climate engineering is being conducted in real time to create extreme weather. He’s betting you won’t take the time to research it and instead will vote to build your own green prison. Climate engineering being used to create extreme weather is very profitable. You can bet for and against extreme weather impacts on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Extreme weather caused by climate engineering also allows the corrupt power structure to use plausible deniability as insurance companies cash in from the devastation caused by artificially generated storms.

We hear part of an update by Dane Wigington on current climate engineering weather effects, followed by a collage of past guests who have sounded the alarm about the many facets of real time climate engineering conducted without public input or consent, deployed in silence and under a false pretense of national security. Weve also discussed how real time, mass scale geoengineering is the elephant in the room regarding the topic of climate change. A reality very few climate change activists are willing to acknowledge, learn about and contextualize into their actions.

Dane Wigington with Geoengineeringwatch.org
Dr. Paul Beckwith ” climate scientist in Ottawa, Canada
Professor Doug MacMartin ” MIT Scientist
Rosalind Peterson ” Researcher ” Agriculturedefensecoalition.org
Cindy Pikoulas ” Research on geoengineering
Dr. J Marvin Herndon ” Nuclear Chemist ” CoalFlyAsh
Patrick Roddie ” StopSprayingUs.com
Wanda Allen ” Citizen Journalist ” Geoengineering
WBAI callers

In Other News November 9, 2019

The relentless hypnotic effects of the mainstream media continue to entrain minds through falsehoods, repetition and teaching to process information through emotion instead of the intellect. In the last few years, comments came in from listeners who were upset about guests questioning the official story of the attacks on September 11, 2001, the Sandy Hook shooting and the Boston Marathon Bombing. The comments were emotional responses without direct criticism of specific content. Its noteworthy to point out that responses such as horrified and upset, etc, while valid in their own right, don’t address facts and evidence. I suspect reporters could be seen as aiding a potential cover-up when they yield to emotional sensitivity surrounding a shooting event (or any potential false flag event) especially if its wrongly used as a shield to condemn any questioning beyond the official investigation. But as Professor Eric Larsen points out, yielding to this pressure create the serpent songs in American journalism and literature.

The state news reported that on April 15, 2013, two pressure cooker bombs exploded near the Boston Marathon finish line at approximately 2:49PM Eastern. Three people were reported killed and an estimated 264 injured. The bombs exploded about 13 seconds and 210 yards apart, near the finish line on Boylston Street. There were many high definition images of the explosions and aftermath available to the public. Similar to the Sandy Hook shooting in Newtown Connecticut, the speculation and alternative theories running counter to the official narrative saturated online media.

Three years later, a detailed 3 hour analysis of the Boston Marathon bombing was posted online. The powerful documentary titled The Boston Unbombing draws from a pictorial record taken almost second by second. It also uses video showing clear detail of devices and techniques normally deployed in disaster simulations. The narrator explores how the event was a carefully coordinated drill presented to all as a genuine terrorist attack. We’re going to hear some of this documentary.

We’ll also hear from the late David McGowen, author of the book Programmed to Kill, and the book Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon: Laurel Canyon, Covert Ops & the Dark Heart of the Hippy Dream. We also hear from past guest Professor Eric Larsen, editor and publisher of The Oliver Arts & Open Press. A novelist and writer, he is the author of A Nation Gone Blind: America in an Age of Simplification and Deceit, and The Skull of Yorick: The Emptiness of American Thinking at a Time of Grave Peril—Studies in the Cover-up of 9/11.

The Boston Unbombing documentary narrator calls the Boston Marathon Bombing a disaster preparedness drill gone live which was carried out by people within various federal and local government agencies that have been involved in running mega-disaster preparedness drills across America for years now. The documentary focuses on the first explosion site near the finish line because of the availability of high quality photographic and video footage. Essentially throughout the whole documentary the explosions are described as pyrotechnic displays. Like many staged events and false flags, a rigorous examination processed through a calm, rational mind can reveal important anomalies. For example, almost 2 hours after the winner crosses the finish line, there is a group of mainstream media cameramen still there eagerly poised. The implication is that they’re in on it. How can that be you ask? Operation Mockingbird is generally defined as a large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early 1950s attempting to manipulate news media for propaganda purposes.

In Other News November 2, 2019

On average about 10 percent of children aren’t the genetic offspring of their supposed biological fathers. That’s one out of ten people you may know. It could be almost a billion people worldwide. In 1996, Professor Robin Baker published the book Sperm Wars: The Science of Sex and it essentially elaborates on sperm competition theory. If competition is heritable, females fertilized by the most competitive sperm will gain through the greater reproductive success of their sons. There are three categories of sperm, egg-getters, killers, and blockers. A study in the UK showed that 4 percent of people are conceived through sperm warfare. This internal dynamic is known to drive subconscious behavior and shapes the sexual behavior of every man, woman and child. The research behind these concepts that began in 1985, examine million year old programming coded into human biology. Some cultures condemn infidelity and masturbation however these acts have been found to be ancient strategic advantages toward successful human reproduction.

We hear part two of the interview with Dr. Baker about his book Sperm Wars: The Science of Sex that has outlined thirty-seven short stories of people engaged in many types of sexual behavior. Professor Robin Baker is an evolutionary biologist who authored nearly one hundred scientific papers, six academic books and is the author of four popular science books: Sperm Wars; Baby Wars; Sex in the Future; and Fragile Science.

 

In Other News October 26, 2019

 

On average about 10 percent of children aren’t the genetic offspring of their supposed biological fathers. That’s one out of ten people you may know. It could be almost a billion people worldwide. In 1996, Professor Robin Baker published the book Sperm Wars: The Science of Sex and it essentially elaborates on sperm competition theory. If competition is heritable, females fertilized by the most competitive sperm will gain through the greater reproductive success of their sons. There are three categories of sperm, egg-getters, killers, and blockers. A study in the UK showed that 4 percent of people are conceived through sperm warfare. This internal dynamic is known to drive subconscious behavior and shapes the sexuality of every man, woman and child. The research behind these concepts that began in 1985, examine million year old programming coded into human biology. Some cultures condemn infidelity and masturbation however these acts have been found to be ancient strategic advantages toward successful human reproduction. We talk with Dr. Baker about his book Sperm Wars: The Science of Sex outlining thirty-seven short stories of people engaged in many types of sexual behavior. As each story unfolds, the role of sperm competition is explained.

Youtube Version Here

Guest – Professor Robin Baker is an evolutionary biologist who authored nearly one hundred scientific papers, six academic books and is the author of four popular science books: Sperm Wars; Baby Wars; Sex in the Future; and Fragile Science. He’s also written three novels: Primal; Caballito; and The Hitchhiker’s Child which under the guise of being sexual whodunits continue the theme of the evolution of human sexual behavior.

In Other News October 19, 2019

 

The digital technology that was designed to meaningfully connect people has created a landscape of passive users who have unwittingly become the product. A recent survey finds that 42% of the time Americans are awake, their eyes are fixated on a television, smartphone, computer, tablet, or other device. Can humans reconnect to their true social nature and reignite visions of their many possible futures or will human dreams be extinguished by artificial intelligence? Our guest award winning author Douglas Rushkoff points out how neuroscientists have confirmed that humans need input from organic three dimensional space in order to establish trusting relationships.

In his newly published book Team Human, Rushkoff says its time to intervene on our own behalf and return to facing each other literally in business, education, diplomacy and romance.

Guest – Douglas Rushkoff is also a media theorist and broadcaster. He hosts the podcast Team Human and has written twenty books including Present Shock, Media Virus, Throwing Rocks At The Google Bus and Siberia. Rushkoff has originated concepts such as viral media and social currency. He is also the leading voice for applying digital media toward social and economic justice.

Load More Posts