In Other News June 25, 2018

 

Recently, we heard Professor Eric Larsen admonish those who have become obediently ignorant and comfortable living in a country that continues to wage multiple illegal wars in the name of its citizens, that continues to strip away civil liberties granted by the US Constitution, that continues to build the surveillance panopticon vacuuming up emails, phone calls and personal data of its citizens, that continues to remind you that the repealing of freedoms are necessary for your security and the nation’s security. We are now unconsciously living in this new reality created by an irrelevant government inserting itself, trying to take away the power of the people to help one another.

A distorted media and essentially news blackout has been described as the most single powerful weapon used against the people in the United States. These distortions are also necessary for the positioning of athletes, comicbook characters, musicians, and celebrities as heroes to praise and idolize while whistleblowers, the real heroes have become vilified. Many thoughtful people have pointed out this sick inversion. Among them is our guest Doug Auld.

Guest – Doug Auld is an artist who created his own lexicon of heroes memorialized in oil painting portraits. The project is called Those Who Blew The Whistle: 100 Portraits of Whistleblowers and Informers. Whistleblower is generally defined as a person who informs on a person or organization engaged in an illicit activity. Doug broadens the definition to include informers (not informants) who bring previously unknown and unaccepted information forward.

 

By |2018-06-26T01:06:49+00:00June 25th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News June 25, 2018

In Other News June 4, 2018

 

On this show we’ve covered topics such as the eventual transition to renewable or free energy systems, telluric energy, ley lines, and the deliberate exploitation of this natural realm with guests such as Peter Champoux, Matthew Delooze, Dr. Ross Hamilton and Dr. Carmen Boulter There are threads from these past shows that connect together such as how leylines tend to carry telluric current, electromagnetic energy that effect our glial cells. On the positive side telluric current fuels creativity as discussed in a past show that mapped hidden New York City ley lines. We also discussed an ancient powerful leyline nexus in Washington DC below the Capitol building, but before that was built, it was a sacred meeting location for indigenous tribes. The telluric currents and intersections were essential to early human populations and those energy lines are imbued by the memories of what occurred at those sites.

With this background and context we connect in with the career path of geophysicist Dr. Brandon Brygider who conducted surveys across the continent for oil, coal and geothermal energy. He at one point became part of a geothermal exploration team named Group 7. We’ll also examine his involvement and knowledge of related secret projects such as Project Moondust. His experiences strengthened parallels to the sacred Native American sites and cultures and support his analysis that the land shall conquer all.

Guest – Dr. Brandon Brygider graduated from the Colorado School of Mines in 1978 and in 1980 graduated with Bachelors and Masters degrees in Geophysical Engineering. He’s also a graduate of St John’s Law School with a J.D. in energy and environmental law. Dr. Brygidier practices forensic geophysics and has taught at local universities and Brookhaven National Laboratories.

By |2018-06-04T20:53:17+00:00June 4th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News June 4, 2018

In Other News May 7, 2018

 

We hear the second hour of the April 26, 2018 geoengineering debate with Dane Wigington and Professor Paul Beckwith. This is also the second debate with Professor Beckwith. As you will hear in this one hour, the discussion breaks down as Professor Beckwith refuses to directly respond to specific inquiry.

Here are the youtube versions on Dane Wigington’s channel if you want to check out comments, such as the one posted below.

Dane-ProfPaulBeckwith
Dane-ProfDougMacMartin
Dane-Patrick Wood
Dane-ProfPaulBeckwith 2

In the second hour, Professor Paul Beckwith returns for round two. Professor Paul Beckwith explores the data showing rapidly changing weather patterns. Beckwith said he would look in to Dane’s research on real time climate engineering indicating that ongoing geoengineering programs are a major causal factor related to the accelerating climate disasters and disruptions.

Professor Beckwith is a physicist and engineer. He’s a part-time professor at the University of Ottawa, laboratory of paleoclimatology and is in a Ph.D. program, with a focus on Abrupt Climate System Change and is also at Carlton University, department of Geography and Environmental studies.

Dane Wigington has a background in solar energy and forestry, he’s a former employee of Bechtel Power Corp and is the lead researcher for Geoengineerwatch.org. Dane focuses on the climate engineering issue and claims available evidence indicates geoengineering has been fully deployed for decades with catastrophic effects. Dane welcome back to the second live geoengineering discussion.

What is climate engineering or geoengineering, some define it as the deliberate modification of a planet’s environment by the addition or subtraction of a resource or energy input on a massive scale. Proposed geoengineering projects on Earth, often introduced as a means of combating climate change , have included space mirrors, aluminum or sulfur-spraying in the stratosphere, and oceanic carbon sequestration.

 

From youtube video of second debate with Paul Beckwith:

———

I will not unsubscribe to Paul’s channel, but I no longer donate. (Of course I donate to geoengineeringwatch.org) Paul’s time and effort that he has put into his tutorial videos are still VERY valuable. Yes, it’s unfortunate, he practically refuses to take into consideration the climate engineering realities, specifically solar radiation management (SRM) and its “proposed” practices. But, cmon, his videos are not full of lies. There’s a lot of validity to them. His scientific observations and researching efforts are genuine. He cares about peoples understanding of the natural world, and in essence for life on planet earth. He speaks passionately about an ice free Arctic within 2 years, if not sooner. So, I will not discredit his videos. For instance, the feedback loops in the Arctic videos are still worthy of sharing for anyone who wants to learn (more) about the processes behind them. Anyone Ive shared those videos with are grateful for the share… So, I now ask you all, more so, I ask Mr. Beckwith, if you refuse to read or view what you disagree with how can you gain deeper insights into your own convictions? What we (all need) want is to show Paul the light. And allow him to come to conclusions on his own. That won’t happen if we shun him for not seeing it yet… Key word, YET. I BELIEVE he will come around. I believe everyone will. Fingers crossed. Toes too! But, positivity is the way to lead. Bullying someone into believing your (our) ways is not conducive in changing someone’s mind. It makes them more prone to denying the facts, thus getting further away from seeing the light. Anyway, either way, we shouldn’t be insulting him for his efforts in an attempt at a SECOND debate with Dane. Yes, indeed Paul failed again at disproving Danes theoretical research. Dane makes him look a fool. And that probably makes him angry. But, that’s human nature. Dane aggravates, in my opinion, EVERYONE he debates. Not because he wants to though. Dane is just amazing that way because he is so diligent in his efforts in finding the truth and then by the sharing of it. So, let’s give credit where credit is due, and say it is definitely ballsy of PAUL to willingly engage in another debate. That’s not necessarily a compliment, but it’s not an insult either. So, for the love of all things good, could you, Paul, at least look at some of the RESEARCH and information provided on Geoengineeringwatch.org? Pleaseeeee, Paul….that’s all I and really anyone, can ask of you. Dane provides that information and research so individuals don’t have to spend the years of time, mental energy, or physical effort he has in order to find the information themselves. And I thank him from the bottom of my heart for doing so. Since this information is being strategically hidden from us through distraction and gag orders. Dane asks/tells, everyone not to believe him, and to do their own research, but he helpfully provides what he has found already to anyone who wants to view it. This is not a malicious attempt to misguide people, but a sincere way of letting any and everyone see what he’s already found and seen for himself. So, again, I beg you, Paul, at least challenge your own convictions. If you insist on having biased opinions towards one thing, versus another, well for crying out loud, don’t let yourself become ignorant because of your bias. Naivety is one thing, ignorance is another. Since, neither are traits one wants to be characterized by, lets agree that ignorance is far worse. Ignorance is bliss.. Why? Because ignorance is due to an observation(s) being denied, consciously, of critical/logical thought processes. Naivety is an unconscious DELAY in critical/logical thought process because of a LACK in understanding of the observation(s).
By |2018-05-12T17:12:01+00:00May 7th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News May 7, 2018

In Other News April 30, 2018

 

We hear the first part of last week’s second live debate on geoengineering with Dane Wigington and Patrick Wood. One listener wrote an interesting synopsis about the first debate:

It’s interesting how in the first hour, even though Dane & Patrick ended up agreeing on most issues, things grew increasingly acrimonious. Patrick was obviously coming from some kind of libertarian perspective, where gov’t regulation is anathema. The problem is, that mindset doesn’t work when rogue elements are out of control. Plus, he had a much rosier idea of the planet’s ability to self-heal than the facts warrant.
——–

In this special In Other News broadcast we will again engage in rigorous discussion of opposing viewpoints on geoengineering. Dane Wigington will speak with author Patrick Wood who researches the technocratic totalitarianism but consciously omits climate engineering within the belief that climate change data and concerns are not real and that its part of a multi-prong scam. A scam imposed by entities such as the Trilateral Commission and the United Nations that set up the long game now known as Agenda 2030. Dane Wigington will counter with climate change and climate engineering evidence indicating climate change is real, and that climate engineering has been fully deployed – further fueling an overall climate collapse.

What is climate engineering or geoengineering, some define it as the deliberate modification of a planet’s environment by the addition or subtraction of a resource or energy input on a massive scale. Proposed geoengineering projects on Earth, often introduced as a means of combating climate change , have included space mirrors, aluminum or sulfur-spraying in the stratosphere, and oceanic carbon sequestration.

Dane Wigington has a background in solar energy and forestry, he’s a former employee of Bechtel Power Corp and is the lead researcher for Geoengineerwatch.org. Dane focuses on the climate engineering issue and claims available evidence indicates geoengineering has been fully deployed for decades with catastrophic effects. Dane welcome back to the second live geoengineering discussion.

Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda’s 21, and 2030 and the history of Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton. Wood is a leading expert on the elitist Trilateral Commission, and their policies and achievements in creating their self-proclaimed New International Economic Order which is the essence of Sustainable Development on a global scale.

By |2018-05-01T01:48:55+00:00May 1st, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News April 30, 2018

In Other News April 23, 2018

 

This Thursday April 26, 3-5PM, there will be a second In Other News special discussing opposing viewpoints on geoengineering live on WBAI. Dane Wigington will speak with author Patrick Wood who researches the technocratic totalitarianism but consciously omits climate engineering within the belief that climate change data and concerns are not real and that its part of a multi-prong scam. A scam imposed by entities such as the Trilateral Commission and the United Nations that set up the long game known as Agenda 2030. Dane Wigington will counter with climate change and climate engineering evidence indicating climate change is real, and that climate engineering has been fully deployed – further fueling an overall climate collapse.

To be clear, you can’t talk technocracy, Agenda 2030 and the Trilateral Commission without mentioning the ongoing real time climate engineering.

In the second hour, Professor Paul Beckwith returns for round two. Professor Paul Beckwith explores the data showing rapidly changing weather patterns. Beckwith said he would look in to Dane’s research on real time climate engineering indicating that ongoing geoengineering programs are a major causal factor related to the accelerating climate disasters and disruptions.. That’s this Thursday April 26, 3-5PM live on WBAI.

In the process of putting this second live on air discussion together I sent out many requests to a variety of scientists and experts on climate change and geoengineering. Most of them declined. But I found it interesting that the scientists who declined such as David Keith and Gernot Wagner at Harvard University or Ken Caldiera at Stanford. These scientists are in a position to knowledgeably speak on geoengineering. You would expect, in a normal world that scientists who work in this field of study, when presented with mountains of evidence that a massive aerosol operation is in full deployment, would stand up and at least present a scientific argument. Instead their tone goes beyond dismissive, mocking and arrogant. Some of them claim they’re receiving death threats from the activists working in the anti-geoengineering communities. I’m not saying people aren’t upset by this group of arrogant scientists but I might suggest that these death threats are a counter measure to discredit anti-geoengineering activists as unstable and dangerous.

So, Wagner immediately departs from the specific topic to mislead and then calls what the Dr. is referring to (ongoing aerosol operations) contrails. Can you now understand why people are upset with David Keith, Ken Caldiera, Gernot Wagner and others?

This atitude isn’t unlike how the medical industry will force doctors to make their patients suffer because while they know the cure to a disease through natural remedy, they’ll instead prescribe a drug. Chanca Piedra, the herb that grows on the side of the road in Mexico breaks up kidney stones at the same time relaxing the muscles surrounding the ureter that involuntarily contract around the stone creating pain. You won’t be told about this miracle herb by the medical industry.

Meanwhile, the geoengineering industry are selling their wares, as the start up businesses focus on their markets and government, military contracts. This, in my opinion is the effort to transition out of the black operations and into the open as so called heroes saving the planet. Remember, that film Geostorm? When Hollywood tries to fictionalizes a so called conspiracy, big plans ahead.

We hear from past interviews on the topic of geoengineering, or climate engineering or the illegal aerosol operations.

Most listeners to this show know that one of the main areas of focus is on weather control technology, geoengineering, and the spraying of aerosolized chemicals into the atmosphere at various altitude. This is in context to the agenda of the climate change slash global warming scandal. Anti-geoengineering activists are not against taking care of the environment, they’re not against designing lifestyles that are more harmonious to natural ecosystems, it’s actually the opposite. As many listeners know, what’s very sneaky here is that the very topic of being environmentally mindful has been hijacked. The anti-geoengineering activists actually care deeply about the health of the environment, that’s why they’ve sounding the alarm about the effects of spraying soft metals into the atmosphere and using electromagnetic technology to heat weather systems. That technology changes weather patterns on a mass scale.

This scam is a critical lynchpin for the surveillance state and its steamrolling ahead under the United Nations Agenda for the 21st Century protocol. Huge climate summits and conferences are convening to that may end with a global carbon tax. This would be a sucker punch to the economies of countries world wide recovering from recessions or austerity. Meanwhile, we are to believe at this point that there is no weather control technology being used, only cloud seeding, that mother nature is dying and retaliating with violent weather, therefore you, the individual will be taxed. As past guest Andrew Hennessey had written – ‘We’ ; have polluted the earth, destroyed our planet, started wars – and ‘WE’ should be punished etc etc. The blame gets laid at the door of ‘We’ the common people. ”

Ignore the thankless work of anti-geoengineering activists across the world who have pushed back against the torrent of well funded propaganda. The amplified voices of trusted experts and scientists betray the public in asserting that the persistent jet trail lines and grid work, compass and square designs in the sky are merely natural condensation trails and to consider otherwise is delusional. Yet, most of us who have looked at the research have seen the patents on this very same technology. We’ve seen the military white papers matching the exact activity witnessed marring the skies. The arrogance of carrying out this operation in full view is almost incomprehensible for some. Recently, Dr. J. Marvin Herndon’s scientific paper on Coal Fly Ash shocked the scientific community and a retaliation is being launched against him. Similar to Dr. Judy Wood, author of Where Did the Towers Go?, Dr. Herndon stood up and did the right thing by using his experience, knowledge and resources to officially determine for all of us that the substance in the rain water samples are matching more than 90 percent the various chemicals in coal fly ash, like a fingerprint.

Sodium fluoride is a highly toxic chemical compound waste by-product from the phosphate fertilizer industry, the aluminum industry and atomic weapons labs. Sodium fluoride is regularly dumped into public drinking water. Experts and doctors say these industries have found it more cost effective to use human beings as filter machines for their hazardous waste, than to properly dispose of the toxic compounds. Yet, to take the coal fly ash from smoke stack scrubbers, aerosolize and spray it into the troposphere appears to most people to be a massive criminal act. Not in the United States, however, the EPA doesn’t list coal fly ash as a toxic substance. Do some research on it. Look up the association on coal fly ash and see how expensive it is to dispose of it, its used in cement, roads, and is sequestered in lined ponds, because its also radioactive. Yet according to real scientific research, its being sprayed in the atmosphere. We listen now to several past guests discussing the topic of weather control, UN Agenda 21 and health effects from atmospheric aerosol operation fallout.

By |2018-04-25T03:06:53+00:00April 23rd, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News April 23, 2018
Load More Posts