In Other News September 24, 2018

 

Today we look back at several interviews with guests that all reference a type of silent invasion within the human race. The basic story structure is as follows, the invasion has been long complete, the anti-hero or protagonist through some mishap suddenly has the ability to see the monsters or aliens that have been walking among human beings for millennia. Stories such as Ray Nelson’s Eight O’Clock In The Morning, Stephen King’s The Ten O’Clock People and Hunter S Thompson – Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas, all reference an altering of human consciousness either through drugs or hypnosis that would allow the main character the ability to see through the invader’s masquerade.

Author and paranormal researcher John Keel believed some humans were actually androids. In the Bible the Wheat and the Tare parable tells of monsters disguised as humans existing among us. Movies such as They Live, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, and the TV series V are constructed around a similar story line. Are these authors, writers and producers trying to communicate something beyond an entertaining science fiction story? As you will hear in these interviews the line is blurred as to whether this invasion is science fiction or a reality hidden in plain sight.

It is true that human eyes only detect light within a very narrow range within a broad electromagnetic spectrum and that we have a physiological blind spot, the place in the visual field that corresponds to the lack of light-detecting photo-receptor cells on the optic disc of the retina where the optic nerve passes through the optic disc. There are psychological blind spots and personality shadows that are also worth factoring in.

By |2018-09-24T13:52:03+00:00September 24th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News September 24, 2018

In Other News September 17, 2018

 

In one of last week’s Democracy Now shows, they covered the topic of geoengineering in the context of the Global Climate Action Summit in San Francisco. I mention this because of the general lack of critical reporting about real time weather control and geoengineering on Pacifica Radio. Instead of delivering quality reporting based on analysis of past independent coverage to advance the narrative of illegal climate engineering, the topic is treated as if prior critical research never existed. Its as if the research and evidence brought forth by hundreds of skywatch groups across the United States and Canada didn’t happen, or as if the work of those who devoted their lives to bringing awareness on this topic never existed such as the late Bridget Conroy, Rosalind Peterson, Dr. Perlingieri, and many others.

Instead listeners are presented with a news format produced in the vacuum of a controlled environment with a false debate set up involving a board member of the ETC group and David Keith a professor at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. I would like to remind you that David Keith has made a career in the last 15 years selling the idea that if climate engineering operations were deployed, which include spraying powdered aluminum from aircraft into the atmosphere, it would be an inexpensive way to buy more time before a global climate change related catastrophe occurred. I call this a false debate because the truth is that the glaring issue of admitted ongoing climate engineering was not mentioned. Real time weather control operations alter climate and evidence has been presented that it contributes to the warming of the planet. Another issue is that in the introduction to the false debate, the Democracy Now host identifies David Keith as an environmental activist.

For more than a decade, David Keith has been propped up as a front man to push for spraying powdered metals into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight away from the planet to reduce warming of the planet. This operation is also known as solar radiation management. The truth is, that on this show the evidence has been produced that a massive program is deployed in real time manipulating climate. By not factoring this ongoing weather engineering operation into the climate change equation is deceiving listeners.

This lie by omission is part of the organized deception against you, the listener. Calling David Keith an environmental activist is like saying the Vatican doesn’t have a child rape crisis. My guess is that David Keith is paid to cause double think and confusion while the upwelling of businesses likely backed by In-Q-Tel (government venture capitalist) are developing the weather control industry and network. But it needs to be brought out from the illegal underground to be sold to the public for legitimate government funding projects.

By |2018-09-17T21:12:45+00:00September 17th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News September 17, 2018

In Other News September 10, 2018

 

We listen to interviews on the subject of what the evidence has shown about the destruction of the World Trade Center towers on September 11th, 2001, and subsequent free energy suppression. We’ll hear from Dr. Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson, Professor Eric Larson, Attorney Jerry Leaphart, Russ Gerst, and Patrick Kelly.

For nearly two decades it has been clear that a well organized and funded operation has tried to lead people away from the facts and evidence of how the World Trade Towers disintegrated. Its also clear that the second net alternative media will not tell the truth about Dr. Judy Wood’s research, using facts and evidence pointing to the destructive mechanism that caused the towers to come apart. To determine what happened to the towers on September 11, all available evidence must be considered.

On the cover of Dr. Judy Wood’s book titled Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 911 is a high resolution photograph capturing one of the towers imploding into a fountain of dust. From the photographers angle, the tower was about 5 seconds into its destruction and the top half of the building had vanished opening a clear view to the Hudson River. Her 500 page book compiles irrefutable scientific evidence of how a destructive mechanism was used to make matter come apart on that day. The book has steered many readers away from the conditioning and disinformation deployed to mislead and distract from the real research since the events on September 11, 2001.

Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering. Her interests are in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She has degrees in Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Engineering Mechanics, and got her PhD in Materials Engineering Science from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and the State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.

In 2005, several reports mandated by Congress were issued by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) to determine why and how World Trade Center 1 and World Trade Center 2 collapsed. The word collapse used to describe the tower’s destruction is inaccurate by the way.

In April 2007, Dr Judy Wood and Connecticut attorney Jerry Leaphart filed a Qui Tam complaint against contractors such as Applied Research Associates known as ARA who were among the groups tasked to produce the reports. Parts of Dr. Judy Wood’s book titled Where Did the Towers Go? were submitted as evidence in this case. This evidence shows that both towers turned to dust before a gravity driven collapse was possible. Its critical to understand that this evidence can’t be explained by thermal or kinetic destructive mechanisms.

By |2018-09-10T15:43:38+00:00September 10th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News September 10, 2018

In Other News September 3, 2018

 

As we near the anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, we listen back to a rare interview with Andrew Johnson and Jerry Leaphart, Dr. Judy Wood’s attorney. In 2005, several reports mandated by Congress were issued by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) to determine why and how World Trade Center 1 and World Trade Center 2 collapsed. In April 2007, Dr Judy Wood and Connecticut attorney Jerry Leaphart filed a Qui Tam complaint against contractors such as Applied Research Associates or ARA who were among the groups tasked to produce the reports. Parts of Dr. Judy Wood’s book titled Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 911 were submitted as evidence in this case. This evidence shows that both towers turned to dust before a gravity driven collapse was possible. Its critical to understand that this evidence can’t be explained by thermal or kinetic destructive mechanisms.

Her case highlights that defendants such as ARA are developers and -or manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons systems or components therefore it would be a conflict of interest in producing a truthful report. Dr. Judy Wood’s research shows that directed free energy technology exists. Destructive directed energy technology also exists and is now loaded on military aircraft and used to destroy targets on the ground. That information can be quickly found by visiting the Directed Energy Directorate online.

Dr Judy Wood compiles a book of scientific evidence showing irrefutable proof that the towers turned to dust in the air by a directed energy weapon. Yet, the companies that develop directed energy technology claim the towers collapsed in their report issued by NIST. What kind of twisted freak show irony is this? Why is it ok to ignore this?

Open your ears and listen carefully for the serpent songs being sung suggests past guest Professor Eric Larson. He wrote the foreward and edited Where Did The Towers Go? He’s the author of many books including The Skull of Yorick: The Emptiness of American Thinking At A Time of Grave Peril; Studies In the Cover Up of 9/11. Professor Larsen characterized the mainstream media as a pus filled sac of poison that turn to a source giving half truths and lies, treacherous lies of omission that have long term consequence.

Imagine what could’ve happened if Dr. Wood’s book became a number one bestseller? What if her book had gained traction back in 2007, and it launched a world wide shift in consciousness about the events on that day. Somehow the fog of cognitive dissonance lifted and the scientific evidence presented in the book was absorbed by people in positions of authority, responsibility, and power and then these people chose not to follow lies of murderous, plotting tyranny. They stood against the intimidation. They rejected and exposed the real lies. According to Professor Larsen’s list they would include journalists, writers, editors, broadcasters, teachers, professors, college presidents, administrative officers, deans, corporate managers, directors, figures in and throughout government at every level from the White House down to the most junior member of the least significant in Congress. Dr. Wood’s work might’ve been celebrated in exposing one of the biggest cover ups known to the human race. There might be statues commemorating Dr. Wood in public spaces.

You might ask yourself why didn’t this happen? To this day, what prevents a proper awareness to cascade through the channels?

In one of his essays Professor Larsen itemizes what everyone knows. Quote – “Without 911, there would’ve been no Patriot Act, no abuse of FISA and stripping away of privacy rights, no Military Commissions Act of 2006 with its setting aside of Habeas Corpus, no implementation of Northcom and deployment of our own military forces on domestic American soil and no trashing of the Bill of Rights and Constitutional guarantees. Without 911, there would never have been any fake and opportunistic “Global War on Terror”. There would never have been Guantanamo as we know it now, never have been official programs of torture or fake demonizing of Islam in order to justify wars. The complete list of atrocities, crimes, and inhumanities triggered by or justified by 911 could fill whole chapters, even books.”

Meanwhile, everyday, hopeful hearts and minds tune into progressive media sources and trust that the content is sincere and honest, but are they also serpent songs in America? With respect to the victims and their families from the attacks on September 11, 2001, we go now to hear the interview with Attorney Jerry Leaphart and Andrew Johnson, a former software engineer and now a teacher. Andrew runs the site ChecktheEvidence.com. He’s author of the book 911, Finding the Truth, which is free to download at his site.

By |2018-09-03T20:54:04+00:00September 3rd, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News September 3, 2018

In Other News August 27, 2018

 

The banning of Alex Jones who had millions of subscribers and billions of views from social media platforms has been an eye opening turning point in the selective censoring of free speech in the United States but specifically about topics that are controversial, sensitive and how a populist and libertarian movement may effect the outcome of another major election.

The very people cheering about selective censoring of Alex Jones wouldn’t be cheering if the same measures were brought down on them. The shortsightedness could partially stem from the hive minding from the actual social media entrainment. But now when the handful of real voices lead discerning minds into investigating false flags, using weather as a weapon, and the epidemic of pedophile cults, that truth tsunami may simply be marginalized with algorithms. If that doesn’t work, and your popularity still crashes through, the next step would be full global capitalist control pressured to silence your speech.

The unclear and vague violations of terms of services such as inciting hate speech used for the mass banning has been a back burner strategy to selectively censor any voice without a specific reason. Youtube in particular will state that its due to multiple or severe violations of Youtube’s policy against spam, deceptive practices and misleading content or other Terms of Service violations. The problem is that there is impartial enforcement of the terms of service agreements, executed with impunity. The safe space, coddling of younger generations, suggesting you’re mentally incapable of making decisions about certain content is also a trojan horse in continuity to justify this type of selected silencing.

But its not only the banning and censorship of voices and viewpoints on video sharing and social media platforms. Mastercard and Visa have also cut off services to conservative news organizations ad revenue processing without explanation. Last week, 34 year old chief executive of Automattic Inc. and creator of WordPress.com authorized a content specific banning of WordPress.com hosted websites. Strangely, he’s known to be a supporter of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and advocate of “Free Speech” and “Open Source” technology. According the memoryhole.org and jamesftracy.wordpress.com, those sites include chemtrailsplanet and cinderallasbroom that published important observations concerning the Newtown school shooting.

Supporting Article a week later after this show broadcast in NYC :

New York Times a “Propaganda Megaphone” for War, Says Former Reporter

We hear parts of interviews from several past guests  including Matthew Delooze, Wolfgang Halbig, Mark Passio and Dr. Lori Handrahan.

By |2018-09-03T16:35:45+00:00August 27th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News August 27, 2018
Load More Posts