In Other News June 11, 2018

 

We continue to report on the various forms of covert stalking, etheric and electronic attacks. Remember listeners its no accident our landscape, hilltops, water towers, and buildings are festooned with antennas, microwave transmission panels, and drums that can disrupt our bioelectric fields, causing cancer, mood alteration and sleep deprivation. Past guests such as Carissa Conti, Don Croft, Richard Bruce, Robert Guffey and Dr. John Hall, corroborate the use of directed radio frequency, sound and or microwave known as psychotronic weapons to target individuals.

The topic of electronic harassment has bubbled up in to mainstream attention within the last year, yet electronic harassment cases can also be traced back to the KKK during the post slavery era. More recent from that time is documented in the research of attorney Brian Glick who wrote War At Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists And What We Can Do About It. In January 1988, news of a secret nationwide FBI campaign against domestic opponents of the U.S. policy in Central America are some of the earliest reports made public.

We’ve talked about the increasing public awareness of high tech covert harassment, especially after the New York Times feature story. Though the journalist or editor shaped the story to portray most of the targeted individuals as mentally ill, the topic must have generated a lot of interest for it to show up on the pages of this major city newspaper.

We’re going to examine details of the gangstalking activity imposed on Josephine Grace that started in Fayetteville Arkansas mid 1995 and continued to 1999. The harassment then picked back up in 2006 and continued to 2016.

Guest – Josephine Grace suspects the covert harassment was triggered by her activism as a freelance journalist and TV reporter in conjunction with a CIA recruiting station located blocks from her home. Josephine has kept meticulous notes in documenting her attacks and police involvement. She joins us today to share her experiences that involved a variety of attacks including street theater, direct energy attacks, torturous sleep deprivation and people wearing invisible suits. If you think invisible suit wearing people should be relegated to the realm of science fiction, we’ll include references to past guest Robert Guffey author of the book Chameleo.

By |2018-06-12T03:19:16+00:00June 11th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News June 11, 2018

In Other News June 4, 2018

 

On this show we’ve covered topics such as the eventual transition to renewable or free energy systems, telluric energy, ley lines, and the deliberate exploitation of this natural realm with guests such as Peter Champoux, Matthew Delooze, Dr. Ross Hamilton and Dr. Carmen Boulter There are threads from these past shows that connect together such as how leylines tend to carry telluric current, electromagnetic energy that effect our glial cells. On the positive side telluric current fuels creativity as discussed in a past show that mapped hidden New York City ley lines. We also discussed an ancient powerful leyline nexus in Washington DC below the Capitol building, but before that was built, it was a sacred meeting location for indigenous tribes. The telluric currents and intersections were essential to early human populations and those energy lines are imbued by the memories of what occurred at those sites.

With this background and context we connect in with the career path of geophysicist Dr. Brandon Brygider who conducted surveys across the continent for oil, coal and geothermal energy. He at one point became part of a geothermal exploration team named Group 7. We’ll also examine his involvement and knowledge of related secret projects such as Project Moondust. His experiences strengthened parallels to the sacred Native American sites and cultures and support his analysis that the land shall conquer all.

Guest – Dr. Brandon Brygider graduated from the Colorado School of Mines in 1978 and in 1980 graduated with Bachelors and Masters degrees in Geophysical Engineering. He’s also a graduate of St John’s Law School with a J.D. in energy and environmental law. Dr. Brygidier practices forensic geophysics and has taught at local universities and Brookhaven National Laboratories.

By |2018-06-04T20:53:17+00:00June 4th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News June 4, 2018

In Other News May 28, 2018

 

We focus in on the diligent complex investigative reporting that examined failed oversight and corporate fraud perpetrated by a multi-billion dollar biotech startup. The company is called Theranos. Its founder was CEO Elizabeth Holmes. In early 2003, Holmes dropped out of Stanford University and created Theranos after patenting an idea to develop portable blood testing machines that use only a single drop of blood. She rose to success and soon became known as the youngest female billionaire. Despite the deals signed with consumer health companies, federal approval, and raving New Yorker and Forbes articles calling Holmes the next Steve Jobs, there were big problems behind the scenes. Theranos blood test technology was exposed as error prone and inaccurate by former employees. Some of the employees fearfully reached out to Wall Street Journal reporter John Carreyrou and he began to investigate. After three and a half years of tenacious reporting, his recently published book Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies In A Silicon Valley Startup now chronicles the hubris and criminal activity that led up to the Theranos crater.

Guest – John Carreyrou is a member of The Wall Street Journal’s investigative reporting team. He joined the Journal in 1999 and has been based in Brussels, Paris and New York for the paper.

Mr. Carreyrou has covered a number of topics at the Journal, ranging from Islamist terrorism when he was on assignment in Europe, to the pharmaceutical industry. In 2015, he won a Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting with several colleagues for a series of articles exposing fraud and abuse in Medicare, the federal health program for the elderly and disabled. Earlier in his career, he was also part of a Journal team that won a Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting for its coverage of corporate scandals. His coverage of the Silicon Valley blood-testing company Theranos has won George Polk, Gerald Loeb and Barlett & Steele awards.

 

 

By |2018-05-28T19:52:02+00:00May 28th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News May 28, 2018

In Other News May 7, 2018

 

We hear the second hour of the April 26, 2018 geoengineering debate with Dane Wigington and Professor Paul Beckwith. This is also the second debate with Professor Beckwith. As you will hear in this one hour, the discussion breaks down as Professor Beckwith refuses to directly respond to specific inquiry.

Here are the youtube versions on Dane Wigington’s channel if you want to check out comments, such as the one posted below.

Dane-ProfPaulBeckwith
Dane-ProfDougMacMartin
Dane-Patrick Wood
Dane-ProfPaulBeckwith 2

In the second hour, Professor Paul Beckwith returns for round two. Professor Paul Beckwith explores the data showing rapidly changing weather patterns. Beckwith said he would look in to Dane’s research on real time climate engineering indicating that ongoing geoengineering programs are a major causal factor related to the accelerating climate disasters and disruptions.

Professor Beckwith is a physicist and engineer. He’s a part-time professor at the University of Ottawa, laboratory of paleoclimatology and is in a Ph.D. program, with a focus on Abrupt Climate System Change and is also at Carlton University, department of Geography and Environmental studies.

Dane Wigington has a background in solar energy and forestry, he’s a former employee of Bechtel Power Corp and is the lead researcher for Geoengineerwatch.org. Dane focuses on the climate engineering issue and claims available evidence indicates geoengineering has been fully deployed for decades with catastrophic effects. Dane welcome back to the second live geoengineering discussion.

What is climate engineering or geoengineering, some define it as the deliberate modification of a planet’s environment by the addition or subtraction of a resource or energy input on a massive scale. Proposed geoengineering projects on Earth, often introduced as a means of combating climate change , have included space mirrors, aluminum or sulfur-spraying in the stratosphere, and oceanic carbon sequestration.

 

From youtube video of second debate with Paul Beckwith:

———

I will not unsubscribe to Paul’s channel, but I no longer donate. (Of course I donate to geoengineeringwatch.org) Paul’s time and effort that he has put into his tutorial videos are still VERY valuable. Yes, it’s unfortunate, he practically refuses to take into consideration the climate engineering realities, specifically solar radiation management (SRM) and its “proposed” practices. But, cmon, his videos are not full of lies. There’s a lot of validity to them. His scientific observations and researching efforts are genuine. He cares about peoples understanding of the natural world, and in essence for life on planet earth. He speaks passionately about an ice free Arctic within 2 years, if not sooner. So, I will not discredit his videos. For instance, the feedback loops in the Arctic videos are still worthy of sharing for anyone who wants to learn (more) about the processes behind them. Anyone Ive shared those videos with are grateful for the share… So, I now ask you all, more so, I ask Mr. Beckwith, if you refuse to read or view what you disagree with how can you gain deeper insights into your own convictions? What we (all need) want is to show Paul the light. And allow him to come to conclusions on his own. That won’t happen if we shun him for not seeing it yet… Key word, YET. I BELIEVE he will come around. I believe everyone will. Fingers crossed. Toes too! But, positivity is the way to lead. Bullying someone into believing your (our) ways is not conducive in changing someone’s mind. It makes them more prone to denying the facts, thus getting further away from seeing the light. Anyway, either way, we shouldn’t be insulting him for his efforts in an attempt at a SECOND debate with Dane. Yes, indeed Paul failed again at disproving Danes theoretical research. Dane makes him look a fool. And that probably makes him angry. But, that’s human nature. Dane aggravates, in my opinion, EVERYONE he debates. Not because he wants to though. Dane is just amazing that way because he is so diligent in his efforts in finding the truth and then by the sharing of it. So, let’s give credit where credit is due, and say it is definitely ballsy of PAUL to willingly engage in another debate. That’s not necessarily a compliment, but it’s not an insult either. So, for the love of all things good, could you, Paul, at least look at some of the RESEARCH and information provided on Geoengineeringwatch.org? Pleaseeeee, Paul….that’s all I and really anyone, can ask of you. Dane provides that information and research so individuals don’t have to spend the years of time, mental energy, or physical effort he has in order to find the information themselves. And I thank him from the bottom of my heart for doing so. Since this information is being strategically hidden from us through distraction and gag orders. Dane asks/tells, everyone not to believe him, and to do their own research, but he helpfully provides what he has found already to anyone who wants to view it. This is not a malicious attempt to misguide people, but a sincere way of letting any and everyone see what he’s already found and seen for himself. So, again, I beg you, Paul, at least challenge your own convictions. If you insist on having biased opinions towards one thing, versus another, well for crying out loud, don’t let yourself become ignorant because of your bias. Naivety is one thing, ignorance is another. Since, neither are traits one wants to be characterized by, lets agree that ignorance is far worse. Ignorance is bliss.. Why? Because ignorance is due to an observation(s) being denied, consciously, of critical/logical thought processes. Naivety is an unconscious DELAY in critical/logical thought process because of a LACK in understanding of the observation(s).
By |2018-05-12T17:12:01+00:00May 7th, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News May 7, 2018

In Other News April 30, 2018

 

We hear the first part of last week’s second live debate on geoengineering with Dane Wigington and Patrick Wood. One listener wrote an interesting synopsis about the first debate:

It’s interesting how in the first hour, even though Dane & Patrick ended up agreeing on most issues, things grew increasingly acrimonious. Patrick was obviously coming from some kind of libertarian perspective, where gov’t regulation is anathema. The problem is, that mindset doesn’t work when rogue elements are out of control. Plus, he had a much rosier idea of the planet’s ability to self-heal than the facts warrant.
——–

In this special In Other News broadcast we will again engage in rigorous discussion of opposing viewpoints on geoengineering. Dane Wigington will speak with author Patrick Wood who researches the technocratic totalitarianism but consciously omits climate engineering within the belief that climate change data and concerns are not real and that its part of a multi-prong scam. A scam imposed by entities such as the Trilateral Commission and the United Nations that set up the long game now known as Agenda 2030. Dane Wigington will counter with climate change and climate engineering evidence indicating climate change is real, and that climate engineering has been fully deployed – further fueling an overall climate collapse.

What is climate engineering or geoengineering, some define it as the deliberate modification of a planet’s environment by the addition or subtraction of a resource or energy input on a massive scale. Proposed geoengineering projects on Earth, often introduced as a means of combating climate change , have included space mirrors, aluminum or sulfur-spraying in the stratosphere, and oceanic carbon sequestration.

Dane Wigington has a background in solar energy and forestry, he’s a former employee of Bechtel Power Corp and is the lead researcher for Geoengineerwatch.org. Dane focuses on the climate engineering issue and claims available evidence indicates geoengineering has been fully deployed for decades with catastrophic effects. Dane welcome back to the second live geoengineering discussion.

Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda’s 21, and 2030 and the history of Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton. Wood is a leading expert on the elitist Trilateral Commission, and their policies and achievements in creating their self-proclaimed New International Economic Order which is the essence of Sustainable Development on a global scale.

By |2018-05-01T01:48:55+00:00May 1st, 2018|Comments Off on In Other News April 30, 2018
Load More Posts